1. Marcia and her Clean Slate colleagues, Jay Ruby and Mike Fogel, completed their required signature petitions and “qualifying fives” gifts a couple of weeks ago, and recently filed their formal applications for the 2024 Arizona Legislative Ballot, per this press release:
Marcia, Jay and Mike have since received confirmation that their application has been accepted as complete, placing them officially in the running. They have now filed for their campaign funding from the State of Arizona, provided via various fees and other income sources (but not from taxes) to candidates who agree to eschew corporate, PAC, and other dark money, and to cap their individual contributions, both in total, and in the amount allowed from any individual donor. They’re also launching a campaign newsletter, to which you can subscribe, here.
Why should you follow along if you don’t live here? I’ll once again post my own personal explanation on that front, as follows:
While this is a regional state level election, a key component of Marcia, Mike and Jay’s campaign is expanding outreach and engagement to prospective voters who are disillusioned with the extreme and performative approach to politics that has become so toxic across the State and country, where consciously and willfully obstructing the processes of governance is considered acceptable behavior in service to often hateful and discriminatory goals. By working hard on their own voter engagement, Marcia, Mike and Jay hope and expect to boost up-ticket Democrats in the State’s Federal races, and given that Arizona is one of a small number of true swing states, those races could easily be the deciding linchpins to defining who controls the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the White House come January 2025, along with who controls the Federal judiciary in the years that follow. These state level races are important for our home in Arizona, sure, but they’re also integral to the national electoral narrative in 2024 and beyond. Your support and encouragement will make a difference!
Finally, the trio also have a nice new campaign profile photo, taken at our county seat in Prescott, Arizona. Here ’tis; you can click it to visit their website.
2. The annual March Madness (or Silliness) NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament began last night, with the first pair of play-in games for the final field of 64 last night; the main brackets start exploding on Thursday morning. This is one of my favorite sporting events, but as much as I love college basketball, I must note that the NCAA has made a change this year to its post-season play that I find awful and annoying, though it involved the second-level NIT brackets, not the “Big Dance.”
For many years, teams that won their conferences in the regular season, but lost in the conference tournaments that came with automatic qualifying berths to the NCAA’s Field of 64, were guaranteed bids in the NIT. Some superb mid-major and small conference teams who stumbled in their own tournaments were thereby given the chance to play on in a meaningful post-season format with its own rich history beyond the main event. For some emergent programs, success in the NIT helped with their subsequent recruiting seasons, and was a precursor to emergence onto the larger stage in the years that followed. A good system with appropriate rewards for solid on-court performance, at bottom line.
But the NCAA did away with that automatic-qualifying rule for conference winners this year, instead guaranteeing two spots to each of the six “big” conferences (five of them the greed-fueled football powerhouse conferences, plus the Big East), along with the identified first-four-out from the March Madness field, who are also generally from the football powerhouse conferences. Because the big conferences already hoover up so many bids in the main tournament, this fills the NIT field with a bunch of marginal teams with unexciting 17-14 or 15-16 records and often losing tallies within their conferences, while small potentially exciting Cinderella programs with stellar records (beyond their unfortunate conference tournament losses) are stuck in the two garbage pay-to-play tournaments that nobody pays attention to, the CIT and CBI, if even that.
With 68 teams in the NCAA Tournament and 32 teams in the NIT, it seems loathsome that programs who put together magical seasons like Quinnipiac (24-9), High Point (25-8), Norfolk State (22-11), and Tarleton State (24-9), among others, aren’t judged among the Top 100 teams in the nation in recognition for their sterling successes, all of them having been neglected by both of the two meaningful post-season tournaments. It’s just another data-point that middling programs from the big conferences will always be favored over the solid programs from small conferences, with money as the obvious underlying factor, and the core concept of student athletes representing varied and diverse institutions of higher education being stomped on once again. Boo!! Hiss!!
3. Last Friday, I went to the local office supply/support shop and printed out this document:
That’s the first physical manifestation of my next book, again collaborating with Rear Admiral Jim McNeal, my classmate at the Naval Academy and Naval Supply Corps School. (You can click on the image for a link to my other books). It’s quite satisfying to have it on paper for the first time, since the oldest components of the book have been residing on my computer since Spring of 2022. We are having it read by fresh eyes for copy-editing this week and next, then will submit it to Agate Publishing on April 1, on-time and per contract specifications, being the good Navy guys we are. (Well, actually, as good Navy guys, we need to submit it five minutes early to be on time, but we’ll let that slide). Target publication date is early 2025. I’ll obviously keep you posted!